1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01048725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the factor sets of measures and local tightness of convolution semigroups over Lie groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a connected Lie group, by a result of DANI and MCCRUDDEN (cf. [6], Theorem 2.1), any abstract homomorphism from a real directed semigroup is locally tight and hence the preceding conclusion holds without the local tightness assumption. We show that in the case of p-adic algebraic groups also, the conclusion holds without the local tightness assumption (see Theorem 1.5); this includes a p-adic analogue of the result of DANI and MCCRUDDEN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a connected Lie group, by a result of DANI and MCCRUDDEN (cf. [6], Theorem 2.1), any abstract homomorphism from a real directed semigroup is locally tight and hence the preceding conclusion holds without the local tightness assumption. We show that in the case of p-adic algebraic groups also, the conclusion holds without the local tightness assumption (see Theorem 1.5); this includes a p-adic analogue of the result of DANI and MCCRUDDEN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Since {Z(#,,)},,~M consists of p-adic algebraic groups, it is easy to prove this along the same lines as the proof of Lemma 2.3 in [6]. Now since Z(Z(#~)) is a p-adic algebraic group, without loss of generality we may assume G to be Z(Z(#~)).…”
Section: Theorem 15 Let G Be Any P-adic Algebraic 9roup and Ma(g) Bmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The embedding problem (for Lie groups, and such other groups for which the statement may be expected to hold) can be thought to have two components: whether every infinitely divisible μ is rationally embeddable, and whether every rationally embeddable μ is embeddable. The answer to the latter question is known to be in the affirmative, (Dani and McCrudden, 1988). It also seems to this author that from a "practical" point of view this answer may be almost as useful as an affirmative answer to the embedding problem, in the sense that in contexts such as in the study of limit laws, where infinite divisibility can be assured from the context it would also in general be possible to assure rational embeddability of the measure, so to conclude embeddability one would need to appeal only to the weaker statement as in the second part above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Proof (i) The second assertion is 1.1 of [3], and the first assertion follows from 1.2.21(ii) of [10].…”
Section: The Embedding Problem For Probabilities On Locally Compact Gmentioning
confidence: 99%