2019
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study

Abstract: Matteo M. Galizzi Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political AbstractWe present a lab-field experiment designed to systematically assess the external validity of social preferences elicited in a variety of experimental games. We do this by comparing behavior in the different games with several behaviors elicited in the field and with self-reported behaviors exhibited in the past, using the same sample of participants. Our results show that the experimental soc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
151
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
151
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work could usefully examine the development of moral phenotypes at the motivational (rather than behavioral) level, for example by exposing the same group of participants to different social decision tasks separated by long time intervals (in the order of months) and measuring cross-task predictive power. Such work should take existing data on the mismatch between laboratory task decisions and real-world moral behavior into account 33 . Follow-up work could also consider testing explicitly for other motives such as reciprocity motives (Falk et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work could usefully examine the development of moral phenotypes at the motivational (rather than behavioral) level, for example by exposing the same group of participants to different social decision tasks separated by long time intervals (in the order of months) and measuring cross-task predictive power. Such work should take existing data on the mismatch between laboratory task decisions and real-world moral behavior into account 33 . Follow-up work could also consider testing explicitly for other motives such as reciprocity motives (Falk et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these scales do not correlate with such an important indicator of life-history strategy, it raises questions about the validity of these scales. Third, cooperation in economic games has recently been criticized for bearing no relationship with actual behavior (Galizzi & Navarro-Martinez, 2019). Extending on these previous studies, the present study aims to overcome these limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The viability of predicting behavior in laboratory social dilemmas from behavior on other laboratory tasks has not been well established, despite a number of investigations (Apesteguia and Maier-Rigaud 2006;Binmore and Shaked 2010;Blanco, Engelmann, and Normann 2011;Camerer 2011;Galizzi and Navarro-Martinez 2019;Kingsley and Liu 2014). If such a link cannot be established, claims that results in the laboratory can inform us about behavior in decision contexts outside the laboratory where the stakes, framing, and incentives all differ are premature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true when comparing prosocial behavior in laboratory tasks to behavior in the real world. Some studies find significant correlations (Camerer 2011;Dai, Galeotti, and Villeval 2016;Karlan 2005; Normann, Requate, and Waichman 2014), but others report remarkably robust null effects across a wide range of tasks and measures (Carpenter and Seki 2011;Galizzi and Navarro-Martinez 2019;Stoop, Noussair, and van Soest 2012). In many studies that do report a significant relationship, the correlation is often noticeably smaller than test-retest correlations when an individual completes the same task multiple times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%