2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2019.103746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the external validity of experimental inflation forecasts: A comparison with five categories of field expectations

Abstract: Establishing the external validity of experimental inflation forecasts is essential if laboratory experiments are to be used as decision-making tools for monetary policy. Our contribution is to document whether different measures of inflation expectations, based on various categories of agents (participants in experiments, households, industry forecasters, professional forecasters, financial market participants and central bankers), share common patterns. We do so by analysing the forecasting performance of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are complementary to Cornand and Hubert (2020) and Bao et al (2017), suggesting that the individual belief heterogeneity is quite persistent over time. Contrary to popularly held views, agents with incorrect expectations may not disappear from the market.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Our results are complementary to Cornand and Hubert (2020) and Bao et al (2017), suggesting that the individual belief heterogeneity is quite persistent over time. Contrary to popularly held views, agents with incorrect expectations may not disappear from the market.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…The author's approach to the analysis of regional indicators, proposed in the article, develops the ideas previously disclosed in the works of domestic and foreign researchers, in particular Statsenko [1], Barinova [2], Klimanov et al [3], Rahmah [4], Szitasiova et al [5], Rickman [6], Yeah [7], Billon and Marco [8], Fornaro and Wolf [9], Raven and Walrave [10], Michaels [11], Biau and Devroye [12], Arifovic and Petersen [13], Christopeit and Massmann [14], Cornand and Hubert [15], Beechey et al [16], Granitsa [17] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%