2005
DOI: 10.1007/11551492_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Existence of Perfect Stegosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the results of[2] and[3] were developed independently of[17]. While[17] provides the proof of the SRL when Alice is average-power constrained,[2] and[3] also develop the achievability of SRL for the peakpower constained covert communication and the converse to the SRL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the results of[2] and[3] were developed independently of[17]. While[17] provides the proof of the SRL when Alice is average-power constrained,[2] and[3] also develop the achievability of SRL for the peakpower constained covert communication and the converse to the SRL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extra log n factor is because of the lack of noise in the steganography context. However, arguably the earliest work on SRL [35] shows its achievability without the log n factor in the presence of an "active" adversary that corrupts stegotext using AWGN. This was re-discovered independently and published with the converse in [3], [4].…”
Section: A Relationship With Steganographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall the assumption in Theorem 1 that no distribution P satisfying (7) can be found. In this case, one can verify that there is no loss of optimality in discarding all x such that σ(x) = σ(0).…”
Section: A Conversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With (38), we can fixρ n and compute the first and second derivatives of the left-hand side of (33) with respect to α n , using, e.g., [12,Theorem 11.9] and [13, (7)]. At α n = 0, the first derivative equals zero, and the second derivative is η(ρ n ρ(0)), yielding (see Lemma 1 in the Appendix for details)…”
Section: A Conversementioning
confidence: 99%