“…The third argument is a sequence of length equal to the rank of W J describing the embedding of J in S. Thus if this argument is [1,2,3,4,5] (as above), the first simple reflection of W J is identified with the first simple reflection of W , the second with the second, and so on. Given our conventions for numbering the simple roots of D 5 and E 6 , we could use [3,2,1,4,5], [1,2,4,3,6] or [4,2,1,3,6] instead of [1,2,3,4,5] (but there is no point in doing so). For inducing from E 6 to E 7 the third argument of induceWGraph should be [1,2,3,4,5,6] or [1,2,4,3,6,5].…”