On the evaluation of uncertainties for state estimation with the Kalman filter

Abstract

The Kalman filter is an established tool for the analysis of dynamic systems with normally distributed noise, and it has been successfully applied in numerous application areas. It provides sequentially calculated estimates of the system states along with a corresponding covariance matrix. For nonlinear systems, the extended Kalman filter is often used which is derived from the Kalman filter by linearization around the current estimate. A key issue in metrology is the evaluation of the uncertainty associated with the Kalman filter state estimates. The "Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurements" (GUM) and its supplements serve as the de facto standard for uncertainty evaluation in metrology. We explore the relationship between the covariance matrix produced by the Kalman filter and a GUM-compliant uncertainty analysis. In addition, also the results of a Bayesian analysis are considered. For the case of linear systems with known system matrices, we show that all three approaches are compatible. When the system matrices are not precisely known, however, or when the system is nonlinear, this equivalence breaks down and different results can be reached then. Though for precisely known nonlinear systems the result of the extended Kalman filter still corresponds to the linearized uncertainty propagation of GUM. The extended Kalman filter can suffer from linearization and convergence errors. These disadvantages can be avoided to some extent by applying Monte Carlo procedures, and we propose such a method which is GUMcompliant and can also be applied online during the estimation. We illustrate all procedures in terms of a two-dimensional dynamic system and compare the results with those obtained by particle filtering, which has been proposed for the approximate calculation of a Bayesian solution. Finally, we give some recommendations based on our findings.

Adaptive quasi-dynamic state estimation for MV and LV grids

“…Again, a similar situation holds for the other buses where only pseudo-measurements of bus power where available for the estimation. The measurement uncertainties concerning the Kalman filter for state estimation could be found in [19]. For a particular choice of initial AR parameter estimates, Fig.…”

“…6 and 7 the correction step. One advantage of the Kalman filter approach is that estimates of the system states x(k) are obtained together with an estimate of the error covariance P(k, k), which can be interpreted as the uncertainty associated with the system state estimate [19]. The covariance matrices Q and R mainly influence the behavior of the Kalman filter as they model the confidence in the measured values z(k) and the dynamic model values x(k).…”

Deformation Measuring Methods Based on Inertial Sensors for Airborne Distributed POS

“…The detailed mathematical modeling of the three deformation measuring algorithms based on inertial sensors is given in this section. The details of KF can be found in [22,23].…”

Toward Smart Traceability for Digital Sensors and the Industrial Internet of Things

“…As for other areas, the metrological applicability of commonly used mathematical methods has been investigated. For instance, in [ 6 ] the authors discuss the relation of the Kalman filter covariance to a measurement uncertainty in line with standards in metrology.…”