2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the evaluation of the Appell F2 double hypergeometric function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simplified methods give analytical results that are more explicit and less restrictive [8]. The method of parentheses (MoB), proposed for evaluating Feynman integrals, gives results in terms of combinations of series(s), and it can also be used to prove the residue theorem [9]. Through A simple evaluation of a theta value and the Kronecker limit formula, we can verify complex functions not only by computing the integral by the residue theorem but also by using elliptic functions or analytical continuations [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simplified methods give analytical results that are more explicit and less restrictive [8]. The method of parentheses (MoB), proposed for evaluating Feynman integrals, gives results in terms of combinations of series(s), and it can also be used to prove the residue theorem [9]. Through A simple evaluation of a theta value and the Kronecker limit formula, we can verify complex functions not only by computing the integral by the residue theorem but also by using elliptic functions or analytical continuations [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The series representation hence obtained, in general, can be written as hypergeometric functions or their derivatives. Independently, the issue of finding the analytic continuations (ACs) of the multivariable hypergeometric function using the method of Olsson [16,17], which has also been automated as a MATHEMAT-ICA package Olsson.wl [18] have been addressed recently. In this work, we show how these tools together, which were primarily directed at solving Feynman integrals, are of sufficient generality to find their use in the evaluation of the integrals considered here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%