2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the evaluation of output voltages for quantifying the performance of pyroelectric energy harvesters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carbon paste replaced the ethyl α‐cyanoacrylate glue to connect the electrodes and hybrid sponge when carrying out the mechanical force tests with large deformation such as bending, stretching, and twisting. The regular electric signals were read out by the assembled testing circuit system, which consisted of a high resistance meter (Keithley, 6517B with an internal resistance of 200 TΩ and a sampling rate of 50, Figure S12, Supporting Information) [ 51 ] and a data acquisition system set up based on LabVIEW simulation model. The different objects including iron pillar (27 g), peanut (1.1 g), soybean (0.22 g), red bean (0.12 g), rice (0.024 g), and millet (0.0068 g) were used to verify the broad stress detection range by dropping them from a height of ~10 mm to upper surface of the hybrid sensors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon paste replaced the ethyl α‐cyanoacrylate glue to connect the electrodes and hybrid sponge when carrying out the mechanical force tests with large deformation such as bending, stretching, and twisting. The regular electric signals were read out by the assembled testing circuit system, which consisted of a high resistance meter (Keithley, 6517B with an internal resistance of 200 TΩ and a sampling rate of 50, Figure S12, Supporting Information) [ 51 ] and a data acquisition system set up based on LabVIEW simulation model. The different objects including iron pillar (27 g), peanut (1.1 g), soybean (0.22 g), red bean (0.12 g), rice (0.024 g), and millet (0.0068 g) were used to verify the broad stress detection range by dropping them from a height of ~10 mm to upper surface of the hybrid sensors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding to the vibration-type energy sources, there are also non-vibration energy sources that are widely present in the natural environment, represented by thermal energy and solar energy [130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137]. Harvesters for this type of energy source have a relatively compact structure because they do not require components designed to sense external vibrations.…”
Section: Energy Harvesting From Non-vibrational Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, self-sustained devices and systems that can operate independently without external power supplies are highly promising and desirable. Energy harvesters are the key enabler for such self-sustained systems, since they can scavenge the ambient available energy and convert it into electricity as the power source. Differentiated by the transducing mechanisms, energy harvesters can be classified into different types, e.g ., photovoltaic or solar cell based on the photovoltaic effect, thermoelectric generator (TEG) based on the Seebeck effect, pyroelectric nanogenerator (PyENG) based on the pyroelectric effect, , electromagnetic generator (EMG) based on the electromagnetic induction, piezoelectric nanogenerator (PENG) based on the piezoelectric effect, triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) based on the contact electrification and electrostatic induction, etc . Since its first invention in 2012, TENG has been vastly investigated and proven as a highly promising energy harvesting technology for ubiquitous mechanical energy harvesting (human activities, vibration, wave, wind, rain, etc .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%