2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the estimation of unsteady aerodynamic forces and wall spectral content with immersed boundary conditions

Abstract: Comparison of two approaches for unsteady load computation on Immersed Boundaries • Extended presentation of a procedure to generate meshes of Immersed Boundaries • The approach is highly validated for two space launcher RANS/LES simulations • The load computation does not require extra operation and is performed on-the-fly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However this can introduce numerical errors that may compromise the accuracy of the acoustic post-processing. Instead, in this study, the stepwise surface reconstruction strategy developed by Manueco et al [27,28] has been adopted for the wall pressure unsteady data extraction. Indeed, this method appears of great interest in the present case, as it does not introduce any interpolation of the flow variables.…”
Section: B Far-field Acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However this can introduce numerical errors that may compromise the accuracy of the acoustic post-processing. Instead, in this study, the stepwise surface reconstruction strategy developed by Manueco et al [27,28] has been adopted for the wall pressure unsteady data extraction. Indeed, this method appears of great interest in the present case, as it does not introduce any interpolation of the flow variables.…”
Section: B Far-field Acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, various techniques have been developed in order to reconstruct fields coming from a boundary on the computation domain (i.e. the computation of the velocity imposed by the IB in our case) or the contrary (reconstruction of the stress tensor on the envelop of an airfoil to compute aerodynamic forces, for instance [12]) such as: mollifier functions (used in the original IBM to approximate the Dirac delta functions [13,14]), extrapolation outside the computation domain (used in ghost cells techniques [15,16]), interpolation (widely used in all kind of fictitious domain methods [5,4]). In the case of infinitely thin obstacles, the eXtended (or Generalized) Finite Element Method (X-FEM), which is often used in the field of fracture mechanics [17,18], provides some advantages: it is capable to deal with discontinuous quantities (typically tangential velocities on each side of an infinitely thin obstacle with slip conditions) while preserving the standard finite element properties elsewhere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, various techniques have been developed in order to reconstruct fields coming from a boundary on the computation domain (i.e. the computation of the velocity imposed by the IB in our case) or the contrary (reconstruction of stress on the envelope of an airfoil to compute aerodynamic forces for instance [44]). In this paper, we focus more specifically on interpolation techniques, widely used in all kind of fictitious domain methods [40,43,[45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%