2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the estimation of pareto front and dimensional similarity in many-objective evolutionary algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the grid-based evolutionary algorithm [29], grid ranking (GR) is for the convergence measuring, grid crowding distance (GCD) and grid coordinate point distance (GCPD) are utilized for diversity. In the algorithm on the base of estimation of pareto front and dimensional similarity (PeEA) [30], convergence parameter is L p -metric and diversity parameter is dimensionality margin distance (DMD).…”
Section: Reasonable Computing Resources Allocation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the grid-based evolutionary algorithm [29], grid ranking (GR) is for the convergence measuring, grid crowding distance (GCD) and grid coordinate point distance (GCPD) are utilized for diversity. In the algorithm on the base of estimation of pareto front and dimensional similarity (PeEA) [30], convergence parameter is L p -metric and diversity parameter is dimensionality margin distance (DMD).…”
Section: Reasonable Computing Resources Allocation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After individualistic and social actions, each individual that in the population is moved to the location of the element in the archive that best improves the corresponding sub-problem, unless that location is already occupied by another individual (line [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Finally, the archive A is the final results which is different from normal algorithms that return population as results.…”
Section: Defective Weight Vector Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) PeEA: Similar to SPEA2, this method is a posterior method to find the entire PF. The experiments in [45] show the performance of PeEA is better than SPEA2 on MaOPs. It is noted that there is no user-defined parameters in PeEA.…”
Section: Comparison Between ĝA-nscsa and Other Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this part, we compare the performances of ĝa-NSCSA and other popular and recent preference-based MOEAs, including the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based ar-dominance (ar-MOEA) [20], strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2 (SPEA2) [44], Pareto front shape estimation based evolutionary algorithm (PeEA) [45], multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) [7], and interactive reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm (iRVEA) [25]. All these algorithms adopt the reference point to describe the preference of the DM.…”
Section: Comparison Between ĝA-nscsa and Other Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If no other solution dominates x , then x is a Pareto optimal solution [ 33 ]. The objective vectors corresponding to all Pareto optimal solutions constitute the Pareto optimal front (PF) [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%