2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the estimation of a celestial reference frame in the presence of source structure

Abstract: The spatial structure of sources making up the celestial reference frame (CRF) at radio frequencies is a systematic error source in very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) measurements. Using simulations, we investigate the effects of source structure on the CRF, determined by the actual observational programme of the International VLBI Service for Geodesy and Astrometry. This is done using the source structure simulator of the Vienna VLBI Software. Applying various mock two-component source models, systemati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This guarantees that, for a given observation, the relative angle between the observing baseline and source structure direction (i.e., the quasar jet projected in the plane of the sky) remains fixed from day to day. As a consequence, we expected the systematic effects of quasar source structure (e.g., Shabala et al 2015;Plank et al 2016) to be the same each day and, hence, to not affect repeatabilities of results during one campaign. For A13, we went even further, repeating two different schedules: one with only good sources (or a nominal structure index (SI, Fey and Charlot 1997;Ma et al 2009) smaller than 2.5) and a second schedule with only bad sources with SI higher than 2.5.…”
Section: Weekend and Aust-cont Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This guarantees that, for a given observation, the relative angle between the observing baseline and source structure direction (i.e., the quasar jet projected in the plane of the sky) remains fixed from day to day. As a consequence, we expected the systematic effects of quasar source structure (e.g., Shabala et al 2015;Plank et al 2016) to be the same each day and, hence, to not affect repeatabilities of results during one campaign. For A13, we went even further, repeating two different schedules: one with only good sources (or a nominal structure index (SI, Fey and Charlot 1997;Ma et al 2009) smaller than 2.5) and a second schedule with only bad sources with SI higher than 2.5.…”
Section: Weekend and Aust-cont Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of the source structure and its frequency dependence on these positions were extensively studied: see, e.g. Porcas (2009), Plank et al (2016), Xu et al (2017), Anderson & Xu (2018). Single-band measurements are sensitive to the brightest part position itself; thus, they are affected by the full magnitude of the core position bias addressed in this paper.…”
Section: Astrometric Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possibilities that make radio sources apparently unstable. The main origin is the temporal evolution of the radio source structure due to intrinsic variability such as the ejection of new jet features, which could manifest itself as an apparent proper motion (Fomalont et al 2011;Moór et al 2011) or positional offset along the jet (Plank et al 2016). Other causes include the difference in radio source position as "seen" by different VLBI networks (Dehant et al 2003) and the weak mi-A&A proofs: manuscript no.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%