1907
DOI: 10.2307/2331633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Error of Counting with a Haemacytometer

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1
4

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The hemacytometer counts used for enumeration were very variable (28,47) due to small differences in pipetting, loading of the chamber, and specimen mixing. Alternatively, the turbidity due to organisms in suspension can be measured and compared with the turbidity of latex bead or barium sulfate McFarland standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hemacytometer counts used for enumeration were very variable (28,47) due to small differences in pipetting, loading of the chamber, and specimen mixing. Alternatively, the turbidity due to organisms in suspension can be measured and compared with the turbidity of latex bead or barium sulfate McFarland standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed one of the classical works by the statistician W. S. Gosset, publishing under the well known synonym "Student" was to examine the distribution of yeast cells suspended in fluid using a haemocytometer (Student, 1907). The conclusion that Gosset reached was that random distribution of yeast cells in a fluid suspension is a Poisson process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of GFP-expressing foci and whether they comprised single or multiple cells was recorded. Data from the controls and treatments were tested for significant differences by Student's t test (39).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%