2013
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2013-05765-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the equivalence of stochastic completeness and Liouville and Khas’minskii conditions in linear and nonlinear settings

Abstract: Set in Riemannian enviroment, the aim of this paper is to present and discuss some equivalent characterizations of the Liouville property relative to special operators, in some sense modeled after the p-Laplacian with potential. In particular, we discuss the equivalence between the Lioville property and the Khas'minskii condition, i.e. the existence of an exhaustion functions which is also a supersolution for the operator outside a compact set. This generalizes a previous result obtained by one of the authors … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even for q = 2, the equivalence of q-parabolicity with the existence of q-harmonic Evans potentials is still an open problem, although results for more general operators on rotationally symmetric manifolds (cf. the last section in [54]) indicate that it is likely to hold.…”
Section: Parabolicity Capacity and Evans Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Even for q = 2, the equivalence of q-parabolicity with the existence of q-harmonic Evans potentials is still an open problem, although results for more general operators on rotationally symmetric manifolds (cf. the last section in [54]) indicate that it is likely to hold.…”
Section: Parabolicity Capacity and Evans Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore natural to ask whether this is specific to the operators ∆u and ∆u − λu or if it is a more general fact, and, in the latter case, how one can take advantage from such an equivalence. This is the starting point of the papers [54,50].…”
Section: Almost Surely Its Trajectories Do Not Escape To Infinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our choice here is to emphasize the next aspect: in the case l(0) > 0, if u * is attained and assuming that everything be smooth enough, evaluating (1.34) at a maximum point gives f (u * ) ≤ 0. Therefore, property f (u * ) ≤ 0 can be thought as the validity of a weak maximum principle at infinity, according to the point of view adopted in [32,27], see also [22].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%