2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the equivalence of regularity criteria for triangular and tetrahedral finite element partitions

Abstract: On the equivalence of regularity criteria for triangular and tetrahedral finite element partitions Brandts, J.; Korotov, S.; Krizek, M. Link to publicationCitation for published version (APA): Brandts, J., Korotov, S., & Krizek, M. (2008). On the equivalence of regularity criteria for triangular and tetrahedral finite element partitions. AbstractIn this note we examine several regularity criteria for families of simplicial finite element partitions in R d , d ∈ {2, 3}. These are usually required in numerical a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2 and notice at the end that after finitely many steps the areas of one-dimensional facets are just t j = 1. Lemma 3 thus follows from (6) and (8) by induction.…”
Section: Lemma 3 Let F Be a Semiregular Family Of Partitions Of A Pomentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2 and notice at the end that after finitely many steps the areas of one-dimensional facets are just t j = 1. Lemma 3 thus follows from (6) and (8) by induction.…”
Section: Lemma 3 Let F Be a Semiregular Family Of Partitions Of A Pomentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Further (equivalent) definitions of the regularity of a family of partitions of a polytope into simplices are presented in [6], [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several variants of the algorithm suitable for standard FEMs were also proposed, analysed and numerically tested in [1,2,3,8,10,11] (see also references therein). It has been commonly noticed that inspite of a general simplicity of this type of bisection algorithms, it turns to be hard to provide mesh conformity and simultaneously to prove relevant mesh regularity results [4,20], especially in the case of local mesh refinements and in higher dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in [2] the following minimum angle condition was presented and its equivalence with the above three, (1)…”
Section: On Mesh Regularity Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%