2013
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2013.17.925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the equivalence of Legendrian and transverse invariants in knot Floer homology

Abstract: Using the grid diagram formulation of knot Floer homology, Ozsváth, Szabó and Thurston defined an invariant of transverse knots in the tight contact 3-sphere. Shortly afterwards, Lisca, Ozsváth, Stipsicz and Szabó defined an invariant of transverse knots in arbitrary contact 3-manifolds using open book decompositions. It has been conjectured that these invariants agree where they are both defined. We prove this fact by defining yet another invariant of transverse knots, showing that this third invariant agrees… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined with our work in [4], it also shows that the 'LOSS' invariant in knot Floer homology satisfies a certain functoriality with respect to Lagrangian concordance. Unsurprisingly, our strategy for proving Theorem 1.9 relies on the combined work of Taubes [44][45][46][47][48] and Colin et al [6][7][8], which shows that there is an isomorphism…”
Section: The Morphism H Encodes Maps Hsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Combined with our work in [4], it also shows that the 'LOSS' invariant in knot Floer homology satisfies a certain functoriality with respect to Lagrangian concordance. Unsurprisingly, our strategy for proving Theorem 1.9 relies on the combined work of Taubes [44][45][46][47][48] and Colin et al [6][7][8], which shows that there is an isomorphism…”
Section: The Morphism H Encodes Maps Hsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Below, we describe some related results and several goals for future work. In our article [3], we prove that our contact invariant 'agrees' with Honda, Kazez, and Matić's E H invariant. Forgetting about naturality, we can view ψ(M, Γ, ξ ) as given by…”
Section: The Morphism H Encodes Maps Hsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each basepoint in a multi-pointed Heegaard diagram for (L, p) determines a differential on HFK(L, p). These basepoint actions have previously been applied in [BL12,BVVV13,Sar15,BLS,Zem16]. The combined actions, subject to anticommutation relations described in Subsection 3.3, make HFK(L, p) a Clifford module over a Clifford algebra Ω ν .…”
Section: T1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a natural counterpart of right-veering mapping classes, right-veering closed braids (with respect to general open books) have been defined and studied in the literature [2,3,28]. In Section 2 we define a closed braid L in open book (S, φ) and discuss how to assign an element [ϕ L ] of the mapping class group for L. Then as a counterpart of the FDTC c(φ, C), we define c(φ, L, C) the FDTC for a closed braid L with respect to an open book (S, φ) and a boundary component C of S. The definitions given in this paper are more rigorous than those in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%