2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2005.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the equivalence between complementarity systems, projected systems and differential inclusions

Abstract: International audienceIn this note, we prove the equivalence, under appropriate conditions, between several dynamical formalisms: projected dynamical systems, two types of differential inclusions, and a class of complementarity dynamical systems. Each of these dynamical systems can also be considered as a hybrid dynamical system. This work both generalizes previous results and sheds some new light on the relationship between known formalisms; besides, it exclusively uses tools from convex analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corollary 1 will be used in the next section to assert the existence and uniqueness of solutions to system Σ g . See [12]- [14] for a detailed development of PDS, and [15] for known relations to other system descriptions.…”
Section: Corollary 1 ( [18 Corollary 1])mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Corollary 1 will be used in the next section to assert the existence and uniqueness of solutions to system Σ g . See [12]- [14] for a detailed development of PDS, and [15] for known relations to other system descriptions.…”
Section: Corollary 1 ( [18 Corollary 1])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that PDS is a significant line of independent research that has attracted the attention of economists and mathematicians, among others. The link to PDS thus enables cross utilization of ideas and methods, as demonstrated in [15]. Using results from the PDS literature, existence and uniqueness of solutions to the GPAW compensated system can thus be easily established, as shown in Section IV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the same end, one might posit P = N C in (1), but doing so offers no advantages: Proposition 1. (Coincidence of trajectories and viability 4 ) In (1) let P (t, ·) = 4 For more on equivalent viable systems see [11].…”
Section: Pursuing Regular Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the closed-loop system, i.e. the system obtained from the system (1) connected with controller (4) or (5) in a feedback loop, has an equilibrium point with x p =x p (w), wherex p (w) denotes the minimizer of the optimization problem (2) for some w ∈ W .…”
Section: Dynamic Kkt Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%