1966
DOI: 10.1029/jz071i007p01879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the equatorial electrojet

Abstract: During 29 crossings of the geomagnetic dip equator near 80°W longitude in February and July 1964, airborne equipment obtained cross sections of geomagnetic field intensity and ionospheric characteristics. The magnetic anomalies due to the electrojet and the amplitudes of Esq echoes show fair correlation of details and fair‐to‐good correlation of large scale features. Width and position of the electrojet vary considerably from hour to hour and from day to day. The data suggest that the electrojet during certain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1967
1967
1973
1973

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also conflicts with the computations of the layer conductivity, •,,, made by Sugiura and Cain [1966]. This finding is also inconsistent with the results of an airborne magnetometer survey made by Gassman and Wagner [1966], who found the electrojet to be 'centered at --1 ø dip,' in Peru, in 1964; on the other hand, ground observations by Mason [1963] There has been a suggestion [Onwumechilli and Ogbuehi, 1967] that 'the electrojet appears to be narrower when it is more intense,' but no evidence can be found for this in Figure 3, and scatter diagrams in which the widths to various fractions of peak intensity were plotted against [R (H)]max for each day also show no significant correlation.…”
Section: It Follows That the Peak Of The Curves Showing The Variationcontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…It also conflicts with the computations of the layer conductivity, •,,, made by Sugiura and Cain [1966]. This finding is also inconsistent with the results of an airborne magnetometer survey made by Gassman and Wagner [1966], who found the electrojet to be 'centered at --1 ø dip,' in Peru, in 1964; on the other hand, ground observations by Mason [1963] There has been a suggestion [Onwumechilli and Ogbuehi, 1967] that 'the electrojet appears to be narrower when it is more intense,' but no evidence can be found for this in Figure 3, and scatter diagrams in which the widths to various fractions of peak intensity were plotted against [R (H)]max for each day also show no significant correlation.…”
Section: It Follows That the Peak Of The Curves Showing The Variationcontrasting
confidence: 55%