1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01011574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the equation of state of classical one-component systems with long-range forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the planar limit R → ∞, the contact theorem (for a zero background charge density) [9,35,52] tells us that the contact particle density equals to πΓ σ 2 which is in agreement with our Γ = 2 result (4.7). The term σ/R is the finite-size correction due to curvature of the disc boundary.…”
Section: Free-fermion γ = 2 Couplingsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the planar limit R → ∞, the contact theorem (for a zero background charge density) [9,35,52] tells us that the contact particle density equals to πΓ σ 2 which is in agreement with our Γ = 2 result (4.7). The term σ/R is the finite-size correction due to curvature of the disc boundary.…”
Section: Free-fermion γ = 2 Couplingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the planar limit R → ∞, the contact particle density is equal to πΓ σ 2 in agreement with the contact theorem [9,35,52]. The 1/R correction due to the wall curvature is exact for an arbitrary coupling Γ .…”
Section: Sum Rules For One-body Densitysupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper we introduce a modified "floating crystal" trial state and use it to prove that three possible definitions of the Jellium ground state energy coincide in the thermodynamic limit. In particular, we resolve a conundrum originating in [3][4][5][6][7] and raised again in [8], where it was observed that the usual floating crystal trial state fails for Coulomb interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, here Q has a sharp crest along the line (2.3) and looking for the maximum term of (2.4) (or equivalently of (2.1)) gives only one relation : In other words, only the combination of z and t of (2.5) will be relevant for determining the particle numbers (constrained by (2.3)). This maximum-term method gives the familiar relation In E=N* In Therefore, after (2.5) has been used, In E still depends upon the additional variable z, and (/3V) -1 In E is certainly not a bulk physical quantity ; it cannot be the pressure (several different pressures have been defined for jellium models [7,8], here we mean the usual one -~F/~V with the derivative taken for constant values of the particle numbers and of the background total charge in such a way that the system remains neutral). This special feature of the jellium modelst, that (/3V) -1 In E is not the pressure -~F/~V, does not prevent us however from using (2.6) for computing the free energy.…”
Section: Grand-canonical Formalismmentioning
confidence: 98%