2009
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2009.2023725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Entropy of Compound Distributions on Nonnegative Integers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(30 reference statements)
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since this is stronger than stochastic ordering [25, Theorem 1.C.1], our Corollary 2.3 strengthens Theorem 2.5 of [16]. Similarly, Corollary 2.4 below generalises Theorem 3 of [29]. See also [17].…”
Section: Applications To Bounds On Entropysupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since this is stronger than stochastic ordering [25, Theorem 1.C.1], our Corollary 2.3 strengthens Theorem 2.5 of [16]. Similarly, Corollary 2.4 below generalises Theorem 3 of [29]. See also [17].…”
Section: Applications To Bounds On Entropysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Proof. Since W ≤ cx Z λ (by Theorem 2.2) and Z λ is a log-concave random variable, the result follows from Lemma 1 of [29].…”
Section: Applications To Bounds On Entropymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4.4. A related extension was given in the compound Poisson case in[59], one assumption of which was removed by Yu[105]. Yu's result[105, Theorem 3] showed that (assuming it is log-concave) the compound Poisson distribution CP (λ, Q) is maximum entropy among all distributions with 'claim number distribution' in ULC(λ) and given…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if X i ∼ Gam(1/n, 1), i.e., a gamma distribution with shape parameter 1/n, then the equally weighted n i=1 X i , which has an exponential distribution, maximizes rather than minimizes the entropy H among n i=1 a i X i with n i=1 a i = n. For more entropy comparison results where log-concavity plays a role, see Yu (2009aYu ( , 2009b. Karlin and Rinott (1981) conjectured Theorem 1 (their Remark 3.1, p. 110) and proved a special case (their Theorem 3.1) assuming that i) a i > 0 and ii) f (x), the density of the X i 's, is supported on [0, ∞), and admits a Laplace transform of the form…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%