2020
DOI: 10.1515/jhsl-2018-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the enregisterment of the Lancashire dialect in Late Modern English: Spelling in focus

Abstract: This paper places literary recreations of Lancashire English into the context of enregisterment and the sociolinguistics of spelling. Using the Salamanca Corpus, I examine Lancashire dialect writings published between 1700 and 1900 representative of both dialect literature and literary dialect to determine the repertoire of forms that were circulated in representations of the dialect. More specifically, my aim is to identify the respellings employed to highlight the pronunciation features that may have been no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third-order indexicality shows enregisterment of those socially meaningful features, which are the object of overt comment and public representation, and are thus ‘deployed as part of deliberate and reflexive identity performances’ (Bucholtz & Lopez 2011: 681) that include dialect writing. Indeed, literary representations of dialect show speakers’ awareness of, as well as ideas about and attitudes towards, regional speech in the form of metalanguage, either explicitly with remarks about the dialect or implicitly in the self-conscious act of the representation itself (see Beal 2009; Cooper 2020; Ruano-García 2020; Schintu 2022).…”
Section: Enregisterment and Indexicality In Nineteenth-century Repres...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third-order indexicality shows enregisterment of those socially meaningful features, which are the object of overt comment and public representation, and are thus ‘deployed as part of deliberate and reflexive identity performances’ (Bucholtz & Lopez 2011: 681) that include dialect writing. Indeed, literary representations of dialect show speakers’ awareness of, as well as ideas about and attitudes towards, regional speech in the form of metalanguage, either explicitly with remarks about the dialect or implicitly in the self-conscious act of the representation itself (see Beal 2009; Cooper 2020; Ruano-García 2020; Schintu 2022).…”
Section: Enregisterment and Indexicality In Nineteenth-century Repres...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, scholarly work on historical dialect enregisterment has been chiefly concerned with literary representations of speech, with special emphasis on varieties of English (see e.g. Beal, 2009;Cooper, 2013;Ruano-García, 2020;Schintu, 2020), alongside some work on American (Picone, 2014) and IrE. We may refer to Hickey (2016: 31-34), who provides a historical overview of the most relevant phonological (e.g.…”
Section: The Enregisterment Of Irish Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on this phenomenon in historical contexts, though, has received less attention. Relevant examples are Asprey (2020), Beal (2009Beal ( , 2012Beal ( , 2016Beal ( , 2020, Cooper (2013Cooper ( , 2016Cooper ( , 2020, Beal and Cooper (2015), Ruano-García (2012, 2021, and Schintu (2020), who have explored older varieties of British English. Further works on historical enregisterment include Picone (2014), Amador-Moreno and McCafferty (2015), and Paulsen (2022), which have been concerned with Irish and American dialects.…”
Section: From Language To Social Asset: the Notions Of Indexicality A...mentioning
confidence: 99%