2008
DOI: 10.1086/588650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Enhancement of Mass Loss in Cepheids Due to Radial Pulsation

Abstract: An analytical derivation is presented for computing mass-loss rates of Cepheids by using the method of Castor, Abbott, & Klein (1975) modified to include a term for momentum input from pulsation and shocks generated in the atmosphere. Using this derivation, mass-loss rates of Cepheids are determined as a function of stellar parameters. When applied to a set of known Cepheids, the calculated mass-loss rates range from 10^{-10} to 10^{-7}M_{Sun}/yr, larger than if the winds were driven by radiation alone. Infrar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
71
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(86 reference statements)
11
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The values given by our DUSTY models agree. They are also consistent with the predicted massloss rate from Neilson & Lester (2008), ranging from 10 −10 to 10 −7 M yr −1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The values given by our DUSTY models agree. They are also consistent with the predicted massloss rate from Neilson & Lester (2008), ranging from 10 −10 to 10 −7 M yr −1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This behavior might be explained by the stronger velocity fields in longer-period Cepheids, and the presence of shock waves at certain pulsation phases (Nardetto et al 2006(Nardetto et al , 2008. This scenario is consistent with the theoretically predicted range, 10 −10 −10 −7 M yr −1 , of Neilson & Lester (2008), based on a pulsation-driven mass-loss model. Neilson et al (2011) also found that a pulsation-driven mass-loss model combined with moderate convective-core overshooting provides an explanation for the Cepheid mass discrepancy, where stellar evolution masses differ by 10−20% from stellar pulsation calculations.…”
Section: T Monsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another consequence is that the dusty nebula is not a good candidate to resolve a possible evolutionary vs. pulsational mass discrepancy for RS Pup (see e.g. Keller 2008;Caputo et al 2005;Neilson & Lester 2008, 2009). However, the compact and hot envelope observed by Kervella et al (2009) still appears as a plausible contributor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown by Mérand et al (2007), long period Cepheids tend to show brighter CSEs in the near-IR K band than short periods, indicating that the mass-loss mechanism could be linked to the pulsation of the star. Interestingly, pulsation driven mass loss models by Neilson & Lester (2008) predict lower mass loss rates for long periods compared to short periods. Using the same models, predicted a sufficiently large IR excess to impact the near and mid-IR P − L relations of LMC Cepheids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%