2022
DOI: 10.1109/tnano.2022.3195116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Enabling of Multi-Receiver Communications With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces

Abstract: The reconfigurable intelligent surface is a promising technology for the manipulation and control of wireless electromagnetic signals. In particular, it has the potential to provide significant performance improvements for wireless networks. However, to do so, a proper reconfiguration of the reflection coefficients of unit cells is required, which often leads to complex and expensive devices. To amortize the cost, one may share the system resources among multiple transmitters and receivers. In this paper, we p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where G T , G RIS and G R denote the transmitter gain, the RIS gain and the receiver gain, respectively. The gain of the surface can then be expressed as follows [24]:…”
Section: Communication Models a Directivity-based Communication Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where G T , G RIS and G R denote the transmitter gain, the RIS gain and the receiver gain, respectively. The gain of the surface can then be expressed as follows [24]:…”
Section: Communication Models a Directivity-based Communication Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) This method has proven to be accurate in evaluating the far field of a metasurface for beam steering by comparing the results with full-wave simulations [67], [68], [70] and has been used extensively in a number of recent studies [46], [47], [67], [68], [70], [71], [72]. The approximations made have a small impact on the radiation pattern.…”
Section: Far Field Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beam training in the presence of RIS has been recently addressed in [44], [45], [46], and [47] for single and multiuser cases. The approaches therein, however, are generic without reference to the underlying RIS technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of utilizing CSI, phase control of an RIS for multiple users can be executed based on the polar and azimuth angles between the RIS and the users [6,7]. Such methods involve calculating the total phase of the RIS by averaging the phases for multiple users, enabling simple and fast calculation of the phase of the RIS and achieving signal strength increments at multiple users to some extent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches [6,7] have been unable to achieve uniform received signal strength (RSS) for each user because previous studies have not considered the difference in path loss and angle attenuation for each user from the RIS. Overlooking these factors leads to a scenario where, while some users might experience high-quality communication, others are likely to be subjected to inferior communication quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%