2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-019-0468-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the elusive nature of the public

Abstract: delivery 21 . For example, Gehrke's recent study 9 on the public's understanding of nanotechnology and tolerance for different regulatory responses puts forward a compelling case that the public's distrust of companies and governments means they are more favourably predisposed to labelling as a form of regulation, rather than traditional 'top-down' regulation. Thus, there may be reasons to explore labelling as a first 'light-touch' approach to nanotechnology regulation, while the science matures sufficiently t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume stakeholders – including ‘the public’ – have an elusive nature ( cf . Beumer, 2019). One stakeholder only represents a temporary and partial perspective.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume stakeholders – including ‘the public’ – have an elusive nature ( cf . Beumer, 2019). One stakeholder only represents a temporary and partial perspective.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US EPA has used the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to require the registration of nano-pesticides as “new” substances and to refine relevant registration policies. The EU member states register pesticides under the Plant Protection Products Regulation, which applies to the registration of single pesticides and mixtures, regardless of size, and this includes the registration of nano-pesticides [ 126 ].…”
Section: Future Challenges In the Development Of Nano-agrochemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, by assuming the unconditional desirability of the wide availability of biotechnologies, democratic publics are portrayed as passive recipients of scientific work. Instead, democratic theory invites us to take publics seriously: to actively listen to publics and to include their interests and concerns in the design and application of new biotechnologies 7,8 , so that science and society to become mutually responsive to each other 9 . The timeframe from first usage to widespread availability certainly matters, but the praiseworthy objective of democratizing biotechnology invites us to move beyond that.…”
Section: Democratizing Biotechnology Requires More Than Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%