2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-1280(02)00021-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the electronic structure of CN −

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equilibrium geometries agree with the trend that the M-C bond in cyanides is typically 0.1 Å longer than the M-N bond in isocyanides. Our C-N bond distances for FeNC/FeCN are in full accord with the 1.14 -1.19 Å range of bond distances in other metal cyanide and/or isocyanide studies, 61,62 as well as various results for the bond length of CN Ϫ anion, including the latest theoretical MRCISDϩQ value ͑1.183 Å͒, 63 our cc-pVQZ CCSDT-3 prediction ͑1.181 Å͒, and a fitted r e (CN Ϫ ) of 1.177 Å from a photoelectron spectroscopy study. 64 The experimental value 7 of 1.03Ϯ0.08 Å ascribed to linear 6 ⌬ FeNC is far shorter than any known C-N bond distance and is most likely due to the large uncertainties in B 0 when analyzing the laser excitation Core is represented by ͓core͔ϭ1 2 2 2 3 2 1 4 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 2 4 .…”
Section: Equilibrium Geometriessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The equilibrium geometries agree with the trend that the M-C bond in cyanides is typically 0.1 Å longer than the M-N bond in isocyanides. Our C-N bond distances for FeNC/FeCN are in full accord with the 1.14 -1.19 Å range of bond distances in other metal cyanide and/or isocyanide studies, 61,62 as well as various results for the bond length of CN Ϫ anion, including the latest theoretical MRCISDϩQ value ͑1.183 Å͒, 63 our cc-pVQZ CCSDT-3 prediction ͑1.181 Å͒, and a fitted r e (CN Ϫ ) of 1.177 Å from a photoelectron spectroscopy study. 64 The experimental value 7 of 1.03Ϯ0.08 Å ascribed to linear 6 ⌬ FeNC is far shorter than any known C-N bond distance and is most likely due to the large uncertainties in B 0 when analyzing the laser excitation Core is represented by ͓core͔ϭ1 2 2 2 3 2 1 4 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 2 4 .…”
Section: Equilibrium Geometriessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…24). Their estimates range from 2.26 to 1.44 D, the last value obtained from extensive CASSCF-MRCI calculations, 23 which come close to the fairly old experimental value of 1.47 D. 24 The negative end of the dipole is located on the nitrogen atom, so that the direction of the dipole is negative along the z-axis which is taken to be pointing from the C to the N atom in the molecule. The radical's dipole therefore points towards the C-end of the molecule.…”
Section: Structural Calculationssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…4͑b͒ can then be interpreted in terms of dissociation induced by the conversion of rotational energy in the CN − anion into translation which is expected to occur predominantly through long-range dipole-allowed J → J − 1 rotational transitions. ͑CN − has a significant dipole moment, ϳ 0.6 D, 20 facilitating such energy transfer.͒ For J ϳ 18 dipole transitions lead to the conversion of ϳ10 meV of internal energy which is consistent with the sharp decrease in lifetime seen for K + ··CN − ion-pair states having binding energies of this order.…”
Section: B Brcnsupporting
confidence: 57%