1991
DOI: 10.1016/0167-577x(91)90061-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the electrical conductivity, thermoelectric power and dielectric constant of Y2Ti2O7 single crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The optical band gap of the YTO is determined to be ∼4.93 eV from extrapolation of the linear part of the [ f ( R ∞ )­hν] n plot based on the direct transition ( n = 2), as presented in the Figure c inset. This value is larger than that of any previously reported optical band gap values of YTO, which vary from 3.12, 3.44, and 3.50 to 4.32 eV . The difference between the obtained results can be reasonable.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…The optical band gap of the YTO is determined to be ∼4.93 eV from extrapolation of the linear part of the [ f ( R ∞ )­hν] n plot based on the direct transition ( n = 2), as presented in the Figure c inset. This value is larger than that of any previously reported optical band gap values of YTO, which vary from 3.12, 3.44, and 3.50 to 4.32 eV . The difference between the obtained results can be reasonable.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Bulk Y 2 Ti 2 O 7 has a direct band gap with an energy of 2.75 eV, which is smaller than the experimental value of 3.12 eV. 51 It appears that the creation of a Ti vacancy affects the valence band structure of bulk Y 2 Ti 2 O 7 by shifting the Fermi level from the bulk value of 3.26 eV to a value of 2.86 eV and creating p-type doping characteristics. However, such character cannot be reproduced by the DFT+U method, since the Fermi level shifts to a slightly higher energy level, indicating that the on-site Coulomb interaction is overcorrected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The forbidden gap at ¥ is 2.78 eV®almost 11% smaller than the experimental value (3.12 eV). 13) Terki et al and Jiang et al have reported similar theoretical values of 2.87 14) and 2.84 eV, 15) respectively. The underestimation of bandgaps based on the local density approximation and GGA approaches is well documented; this underestimation results from the self-interaction error and the integer discontinuity in the exchange correlation energy and potential when the number of electrons is changed.…”
Section: Supercell Constructionmentioning
confidence: 72%