2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3382-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the efficiency of metaheuristics for solving the optimal power flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metaheuristics has been recognized as one of the most successful approaches to solving large-scale optimization problems in power systems [57], including OPF problems [51,58,59]. In recent years, to overcome specific limitations of the underlying metaheuristics, a new field in metaheuristics has appeared combining the ideas of two or more metaheuristic method, called a hybrid metaheuristic [60].…”
Section: Short Comments On Metaheuristic Methods For Opfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metaheuristics has been recognized as one of the most successful approaches to solving large-scale optimization problems in power systems [57], including OPF problems [51,58,59]. In recent years, to overcome specific limitations of the underlying metaheuristics, a new field in metaheuristics has appeared combining the ideas of two or more metaheuristic method, called a hybrid metaheuristic [60].…”
Section: Short Comments On Metaheuristic Methods For Opfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ermis et al [18] proposed wind driven optimization (WDO) algorithm to solve the voltage deviation problem in the IEEE 9-bus power system, showing its supremacy in voltage regulation. Many algorithms are applied to improve the power dispatch on IEEE 57,118 bus systems [19]. The moth-flame optimization (MFO) and grey wolf optimizer (GWO) outperformed the other tested algorithms in power loss reduction, voltage deviation, and stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of single algorithm, there were various hybrid algorithms that have been proposed to solve either single or multi‐objectives OPF such as Moth Swarm Algorithm with GSA (MSA‐GSA) as recommended in Reference 26, Fuzzy Based Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization as proposed in Reference 27 and 28, Hybrid Particle Swarm and SalpSwarm Optimization as proposed in Reference 29, Hybrid of (PSOGSA) as proposed in Reference 30, Hybrid Modified Imperialist Competitive Algorithm and Sequential Quadratic Programming, (HMICA‐SQP), 31 Hybrid Fuzzy Particle Optimisation and Nelder‐Mead (NM) algorithm (HFPSO‐NM), 28 Hybrid of Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Interference System (ANFIS) with Advanced SalpSwarm Optimization Algorithm called (ANFASO) 32 and Hybrid SalpSwarm Optimization Algorithm with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO‐SSO) 29 . The analysis of the metaheuristic approaches into OPF problem has been discussed in Reference 33 where eight different optimization algorithms, that is, MFO, Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Dragonfly Algorithm (DA), Sine‐Cosine Algorithm (SCA), Antlion Optimizer (ALO), Multi‐Verse Optimizer (MVO), Grasshopper Algorithm (GOA) and Ion Motion Algorithm (IMO) have been studied and analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%