1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmva.1998.1740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Efficiency of Affine Invariant Multivariate Rank Tests

Abstract: In this paper the asymptotic Pitman efficiencies of the affine invariant multivariate analogues of the rank tests based on the generalized median of Oja are considered. Formulae for asymptotic relative efficiencies are found and, under multivariate normal and multivariate t distributions, relative efficiencies with respect to Hotelling's T 2 test are calculated. Academic Press

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…v (z) ≤ 1 for all z ∈ R k , Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem allows to conclude that (18) is o(1), as n → ∞, i.e., that (16) is o(1) as n → ∞. One can similarly prove that (17) is o(1) as n → ∞.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…v (z) ≤ 1 for all z ∈ R k , Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem allows to conclude that (18) is o(1), as n → ∞, i.e., that (16) is o(1) as n → ∞. One can similarly prove that (17) is o(1) as n → ∞.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The same optimality property still holds for (S3)-but not for (S2), which is only rotationally invariant-under elliptical symmetry (still, with double-exponential radial density). The reader is referred to Möttönen et al (1997Möttönen et al ( , 1998 for the derivation of ARE values for (SR) and (OR).…”
Section: Asymptotic Relative Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these groups relies on componentwise rankings [see, e.g., the monograph by Puri and Sen (1971)], but suffers from a severe lack of invariance with respect to affine transformations, which has been the main motivation for the other two approaches. The second group [Möttönen et al (1995[Möttönen et al ( , 1998; Hettmansperger et al (1994Hettmansperger et al ( , 1997; see Oja (1999) for a recent review] is closely related with the spatial signs and ranks, and with the so-called Oja median, the third one [Randles (1989); Peters and Randles (1990); Jan and Randles (1994)] with the concept of interdirections.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Assumptions Denote By (X (N)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one, based on Oja signs and ranks, is due to Oja, Hettmansperger, and their collaborators (Möttönen et al [18][19][20]; Hettmansperger et al [21,22]; see Oja [23] for a review). The second one is associated with ranks of Mahalanobis distances and Randles' concept of interdirections, and was developed by Randles and his coauthors (Randles [24,25]; Peters and Randles [26]; Jan and Randles [27]; Randles and Um [28]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%