2013
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2013.2259455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Effects of Calibration Errors and Mutual Coupling on the Beam Pattern of an Antenna Array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in (10), by adding only one measurement with the designed excitation vector A 1 , the accumulated error at the 1st element has been effectively reduced to the same error level as other elements. The proposed algorithm will not affect (i.e.…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in (10), by adding only one measurement with the designed excitation vector A 1 , the accumulated error at the 1st element has been effectively reduced to the same error level as other elements. The proposed algorithm will not affect (i.e.…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By substituting (19) into (14)- (17) and then in (10)-(13), the upper and the lower bounds of P u, f turn out to be analytically determined as a function of the interval bump depths, e i,c , i = 1,…, I, c = 1,…, C i . It is important to highlight that the interval bounds do not correspond to the deterministic patterns obtained in case of 'worst' (i.e.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (5) and (14) the variations among the different The results show the differences between a calibrated and an uncalibrated system. Note that this method does not account for angle-dependent variation of the amplitudes and phases, nor for mutual coupling [46], [47]. The impact of these imperfections is treated later.…”
Section: A Standard Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 also shows the beampattern of a system with quite imperfect calibration. To take account of phase and amplitude variations both parameters are modeled as pseudorandom numbers, see [47]. The results shown here are based on simulations with ϕ IF [m v ]∼U(−50π/180, +50π/180) and A IF [m v ]∼U(0.01, 1).…”
Section: A Standard Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%