2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Effectiveness of Crowd Sourcing Avian Nesting Video Analysis at Wildlife@Home

Abstract: Wildlife@Home is citizen science project developed to provide wildlife biologists a way to swiftly analyze the massive quantities of data that they can amass during video surveillance studies. The project has been active for two years, with over 200 volunteers who have participated in providing observations through a web interface where they can stream video and report the occurrences of various events within that video. Wildlife@Home is currently analyzing avian nesting video from three species: Sharptailed-G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this should be explored with a larger sample of the general population, the popularity of citizen science sites such as Zooniverse.org and Dognition.com suggest that it is possible to recruit large numbers of people for such studies and therefore that our method is repeatable. We suggest it is likely that there is a general willingness to participate in such behavioural research and that it can engage the public interest, as for other crowd sourced science projects (Desell et al 2015;Law et al 2017). As our participants were mostly undergraduate psychology students, there may have been a bias towards participants who were potentially more painstaking than average in their responses as they were being rewarded with course credit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this should be explored with a larger sample of the general population, the popularity of citizen science sites such as Zooniverse.org and Dognition.com suggest that it is possible to recruit large numbers of people for such studies and therefore that our method is repeatable. We suggest it is likely that there is a general willingness to participate in such behavioural research and that it can engage the public interest, as for other crowd sourced science projects (Desell et al 2015;Law et al 2017). As our participants were mostly undergraduate psychology students, there may have been a bias towards participants who were potentially more painstaking than average in their responses as they were being rewarded with course credit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has produced large-scale datasets which could not otherwise be generated (e.g. surveying bird species distributions at national or international levels by using local reports by ornithologists) (Desell et al 2015 ). More recently with the expansion of the internet, researchers have adopted crowdsourcing approaches for mass data analysis tasks which are time-consuming or cannot be automated easily (Cox et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their involvement in monitoring is already established through the many Citizen Science projects where citizens provide data (17) or analyze environmental data (24). It is easy to imagine how automated monitoring systems create micro-tasks that will be evaluated by humans, for example, to inspect photos for the early detection of plant stress, or count the number of pollinators that visit a flower in a video to produce an indicator of biodiversity (25).…”
Section: Human Computation and Adaptive Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt at building image classification models to help identify the trade of exotic live animals on the internet. This work differs from other image identification studies in conservation science (e.g., [15]; [16]; [17]; [18] [19]; [20]; [21]), in its application in the wildlife trade context and ability to deduce the context of the target object. The objective here is not to detect a pattern that identifies the animal, but rather to deduce if an animal is present in the image along with identifying the context (e.g., a cage) in which the animal is present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%