The effectiveness of capital controls has still not been established, and if
they are indefinite they create distortions. This study uses quarterly data
on capital controls in 25 Asian and Latin American countries from 2000 to
2019. We present further evidence on the internal and multilateral impacts
of capital controls using a Panel VAR model with variance decomposition and
impulse-response function analysis. The results show that domestically,
capital controls, became more effective after the global financial crisis,
with more monetary policy autonomy and exchange rate policy stability.
Contrarily, these controls do not affect international reserve accumulation,
and a combination of policies, capital controls, and reserves is required to
assist governments? decisions. Internationally, capital controls cause
negative spillovers that require policy coordination between the countries
setting controls and those consequently receiving massive inflows.