2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-017-1129-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the effect of interactions beyond nearest neighbours on non-convex lattice systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the subject of the last section of the paper. Our aim is to show that the role of the singular term in the continuum model is played in this setting by interactions beyond nearest neighbours, which prevent too many jumps from one well to another (see also [4]). We focus on the simple case of a two-dimensional discrete system governed by pairwise harmonic interactions between nearest and next-to-nearest neighbours, corresponding to a total interaction energy with two wells.…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the subject of the last section of the paper. Our aim is to show that the role of the singular term in the continuum model is played in this setting by interactions beyond nearest neighbours, which prevent too many jumps from one well to another (see also [4]). We focus on the simple case of a two-dimensional discrete system governed by pairwise harmonic interactions between nearest and next-to-nearest neighbours, corresponding to a total interaction energy with two wells.…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for some positive constants γ f and γ s depending on the film and substrate material, respectively. Notice that it would be equivalent to introduce a dependence on discrete deformations y also in the definition of E S ε by considering the sum in (2) as extended over the elements of the deformed lattice y(L ε (Ω h )), if we restrict to small deformations y, i.e., deformations y that do not change the topology of the lattice or, in other words, such that #N ε (y(x)) = #N ε (x) for every x ∈ L ε (Ω h ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why much effort has been spent in computing the elastic energy induced by periodic distribution of dislocations; we refer to the monograph [23, Sec 3.3] for a comprehensive overview. A relevant theoretical question is to understand optimal configurations of dislocations without assuming their periodicity: rigorous proofs that dislocations are favorable with respect to purely elastic deformations for large interfaces, as well as energy scaling properties have been recently faced in a variety of physical systems related to grain boundaries and epitaxial growth, starting from discrete or semi-discrete models of dislocations [2,3,6,7,9,10,13,[15][16][17][18]21]. The goal of this paper is to analyze the simplified version of the Peierls-Nabarro model, based on the minimization of the energy in (1), without assuming any periodicity on u.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%