“…Some examples would be exploration of intersectional methodologies (McCall 2005; Walby 2009), or empirical studies of ethnicity and migration (Manohar 2019; Purkayastha 2005; Valdez 2016), or religion and intersectionality (Avishai 2020; Purkayastha 2012; Singh 2015). Some of this work departs from the trifecta of race, class, and gender, focusing on such other social locations as class, age, and migration status (Anthias 2008; Enriquez 2017; Fathi 2017); disability, sexuality, and class (Cole 2022; Martino 2017; Slater and Liddiard 2018); gender, class, and migration status (Banerjee 2019; Lowe 1996); and transnationalism, caste, and gender (Adur and Narayan 2017; Adur and Purkayastha 2013; Banerjee, Khandelwal, and Sanyal 2022). Although there is nothing inherently amiss in engaging in intersectional analysis beyond the trifecta, we argue that to understand structural violence in the United States we need to return to theorizing the co-determinative impact of gender and race, as forewarned by Crenshaw.…”