1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00052009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the dynamics of vegetation: Markov chains as models of succession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…decreased matrix complexity and rapid reappearance of all species taking part in the post-fire development. Van Hulst (1979) has pointed out that one of the attractions of using Markov models is that the assumptions on which they are based are testable; i.e. one can test whether the process being modelled as a first-order time-homogeneous Markov chain actually possesses the required characteristics.…”
Section: High-level Calluna-eriophorum Bogmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…decreased matrix complexity and rapid reappearance of all species taking part in the post-fire development. Van Hulst (1979) has pointed out that one of the attractions of using Markov models is that the assumptions on which they are based are testable; i.e. one can test whether the process being modelled as a first-order time-homogeneous Markov chain actually possesses the required characteristics.…”
Section: High-level Calluna-eriophorum Bogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the world is not that neat.' Nevertheless, much consideration has recently been given to the use of such models to study vegetation succession(e.g, van Hulst, 1979;Usher, 1979Usher, , 1981 ty types (e.g. Godron & Lepart, 1973;Henderson & Wilkins, 1975;Debussche et al, 1977;Enright & Ogden, 1979;Bellefleur, 1981;Acevedo, 1981;Gibson et al, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transition models have frequently been used to predict changes in vegetation (e.g., Debussche et al 1977, Van Hulst 1979, Usher 1981, Lippe et al 1985 or land use (e.g., Hett 1971, Burn-ham 1973, Johnson 1977) through time. However, these models have not been spatially explicit, and there is no standard approach to incorporate spatial dynamics into transition models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatially explicit model can be applied in agricultural production, secondary forest succession (Wilkie et al, 1988), and coastal wet land change (Browder et al, 1985;Sklar et al, 1985), etc. Meanwhile, former FLMs were enhanced in spatial simulation, such as development and wide application of Markov chain and semi-Markov chain models (Collins et al, 1974;Collins, 1975;Hulst, 1979;Pickles, 1980;Henderson et al, 1975;Wilkins, 1977), further development of GAP model-FORET (Shugart, 1984), wildland fire behavior and fuel model-BEHAVE (Andrews, 1986;Andrews and Chase, 1989) and so on. At the same time, mathematical thoughts extracted from the cellular automata model (Wolfram, 1984) and neighborhood-based transition model (Turner, 1988) is adopted in building spatial landscape models.…”
Section: In the 1980s: Primary Development Of Spatial Landscape Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%