2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2015.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the dynamics of eco-efficiency performance in the European Union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They identified tremendous gaps between countries according to income groups, and similarly high-income countries were ranked top. Gómez-Calvet et al (2016) studied the opportunities for abatement of CO 2 , SO 2 and NO x air-pollutants by looking at the evolution of environmental performance over time [46]. They found that the environmental efficiency of European countries had improved over the period 1993-2010.…”
Section: Literature Review-energy-related Country Comparisons With Damentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They identified tremendous gaps between countries according to income groups, and similarly high-income countries were ranked top. Gómez-Calvet et al (2016) studied the opportunities for abatement of CO 2 , SO 2 and NO x air-pollutants by looking at the evolution of environmental performance over time [46]. They found that the environmental efficiency of European countries had improved over the period 1993-2010.…”
Section: Literature Review-energy-related Country Comparisons With Damentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy consumption and energy intensity, water consumption and water intensity, electricity (Camarero, Castillo, Picazo‐Tadeo, & Tamarit, 2013; Guan & Xu, 2016; Mehmeti, Todorovic, & Scardigno, 2016; Zhou et al, 2018) were selected as the indicators of resource utilization. Sulfur dioxide, soot and dust emission, waste water, and solid waste (Gómez‐Calvet, Conesa, Gómez‐Calvet, & Tortosa‐Ausina, 2016; Yang, Zhou, & Xu, 2015) were selected as the environmental indicators. In addition, labor, capital, and technology (Hengevoss, Baumgartner, Nisato, & Hugi, 2016) were also select as indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, this method was rapidly promoted internationally. The relevant follow-up literature position the following as the analysis objects: OECD (Zhou et al [31], Zhou and Ang [32], Agergis et al [33], Guo et al [34]), APEC (Hu and Kao [35], Zhou et al [36], Ke [3]), EU (Bampatsou et al [37], Chang [38], Gómez-Calvet [39], Robaina-Alve et al [40]), and BRICs (Song et al [41]). In addition, there are many other studies applying this method to make comparisons between different countries, involving Ramanathan [42], Zhang et al [43], Cui [44], and Jebali et al [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%