2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2015.7353945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Dubins Traveling Salesman Problem with Neighborhoods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surveillance planning algorithm will stop the adaptation if i ≤ i max or ν * are negligibly close to their respective s p , or all winner waypoint locations are inside the δ-neighborhood of the respective initial waypoint location. Local Iterative Optimization (LIO) [42] is a procedure that optimizes the whole trajectory locally, e.g., it can consecutively optimize θ i , ψ i , l i a , and l i b in the loop with waypointν i−1 , ν i , and ν i+1 . The reason (5) can optimize variables θ i , ψ i , l i a independently is tangent vector t i a and t i−1 b implicitly satisfy the smooth constraint (12).…”
Section: Stage Two: Uav Path Planning For Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surveillance planning algorithm will stop the adaptation if i ≤ i max or ν * are negligibly close to their respective s p , or all winner waypoint locations are inside the δ-neighborhood of the respective initial waypoint location. Local Iterative Optimization (LIO) [42] is a procedure that optimizes the whole trajectory locally, e.g., it can consecutively optimize θ i , ψ i , l i a , and l i b in the loop with waypointν i−1 , ν i , and ν i+1 . The reason (5) can optimize variables θ i , ψ i , l i a independently is tangent vector t i a and t i−1 b implicitly satisfy the smooth constraint (12).…”
Section: Stage Two: Uav Path Planning For Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ref. [103], the use of a Local Iterative Optimization strategy to independently adjust the waypoints' orientations and positions on the regions was proposed, considering that the sequence of visit is already given. Its main advantage is the low computational requirements comparing to other techniques, such as GAs.…”
Section: Non-holonomic Vehicle Routing For Visiting Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[60] Evolutionary Decoupled Convex Ref. [103] Heuristic * Decoupled Non-convex * The DTSPN instance must respect the D 4 constraint. Fig.…”
Section: Non-holonomic Vehicle Routing For Visiting Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six algorithms for the DTSP-SCM has been compared. In particular, the proposed modifications of approaches: Alternating Algorithm (AA) [1], Local Iterative Optimization [18], Genetic algorithm [10], Memetic algorithm [11], and sampling-based approach [6] with the LKH solver [17] (denoted as the Sampling+LKH) and with the optimal Concorde solver [8], denoted as the Sampling+Concorde. Due to high computational requirements of the genetic, memetic, and sampling- based algorithms, their computational time has been limited to 1 hour.…”
Section: Performance Of Dtsp Approaches In the Dtsp-scmmentioning
confidence: 99%