On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance: Theory and evidence from Chinese firms

Abstract

Research Summary: In this study, we propose and test a multi-stakeholder perspective to address variation in innovation performance across firms. Specifically, we analyze how a focal firm's innovation performance is shaped by its political stakeholders (local and central governments) and economic stakeholders (suppliers, buyers, and competitors). Using a data set consisting of over 26,400 Chinese firms, we first find support for our predictions that a focal firm's innovation performance will be enhanced by both its government connections and the innovativeness of its economic stakeholders. We then analyze whether the interdependent effect of these political and economic stakeholders is more likely to be synergistic versus antagonistic, and find evidence consistent with the antagonistic view. Managerial Summary: We show how a firm's innovativeness is influenced strongly by its relationships to external stakeholders. Specifically, we examine the potentially dual-edged role of political stakeholders (local and central governments) and economic stakeholders (suppliers, buyers, and competitors). Using extensive data on Chinese firms, we find: (a) that the higher the level of government connections, the greater a firm's innovativeness; (b) that firms located in proximity with more innovative economic stakeholders also tend to have higher innovation performance. We also look beyond these independent positive effects to examine the joint effect of these two forms of stakeholder influence, and here we see that more influence is not always better. Specifically, we find that the innovation benefit that typically accrues to firms in proximity to more innovative economic stakeholders is weakened when those firms also have higherlevel government connections.

Corporate entrepreneurship of emerging market firms: current research and future directions

“…Better access to government-supported innovation systems (universities, research institutions, etc.) can not only improve firms' technological development, but also increase the attraction of talented personnel for innovation (Li and Li, 2013;Li et al, 2018). Government can help firms gain access to valuable knowledge, provide valuable resources and help firms to accumulate organization capabilities to innovate (e.g.…”

Balancing social and political strategies in emerging markets: Evidence from India

“…Political strategies consist of engagement with policymakers, targeting these stakeholders via constituency building, sharing information and financial resources (Hillman & Wan, 2005). Social strategies include activities directed toward ethical management and responsible engagement with the business context (Clarkson, 1995, Gupta, Briscoe, & Hambrick, 2017Li, Xia, & Zajac, 2018).…”

Carbon risk management and corporate competitive advantages: “Differential promotion” or “cost hindrance”?

“…Administrative hierarchical distance indicates the level of the government that has an direct impact on the company, which reflects the level of supervision and control over the established company that the government may hold (Wang et al, ). This paper does not use the inherent paradigm of corporate property rights as a moderating variable (Zhou et al, b) but subdivides the case study listed companies into five types according to the ultimate controller data of the company according to the “ultimate property rights theory” and uses the values 1 to 5 to calculate the distance (Li, Xia, & Zajac, ; Wang et al, ). If the company is controlled by the central government, the value is 5; if the company is controlled by the provincial government, the value is 4; if the company is controlled by the municipal government, the value is 3; if the company is controlled by the county government, the value is 2; if the company is not controlled by any level of government, the value is 1.…”