2015
DOI: 10.1051/proc/201551006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Douglas-Kazakov phase transition

Abstract: Abstract. We give a rigorous proof of the fact that a phase transition discovered by Douglas and Kazakov in 1993 in the context of two-dimensional gauge theories occurs. This phase transition can be formulated in terms of the Brownian bridge on the unitary group U(N ) when N tends to infinity. We explain how it can be understood by considering the asymptotic behaviour of the eigenvalues of the unitary Brownian bridge, and how it can be technically approached by means of Fourier analysis on the unitary group. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then by a slight generalization of [13, Proposition 3.5] (see the next subsection for its precise statement with a detailed proof) there exist universal coefficients c σ , σ ∈ S ℓ+1 , depending on the t ij and X, and a universal constant C > 1, depending only on T and L(P ) due to (14) (and hence only on P ), such that…”
Section: The Convergence Is Uniform In Time S Let Us Introduce the Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then by a slight generalization of [13, Proposition 3.5] (see the next subsection for its precise statement with a detailed proof) there exist universal coefficients c σ , σ ∈ S ℓ+1 , depending on the t ij and X, and a universal constant C > 1, depending only on T and L(P ) due to (14) (and hence only on P ), such that…”
Section: The Convergence Is Uniform In Time S Let Us Introduce the Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What makes the partition function nontrivial is the constraint that the endpoints of the path are exactly I and U , which turns the path integral into an integral over Brownian bridges (see, e.g., [55] for details on the Brownian bridge in a unitary group) on SU(H). In this context, fluctuations in the bulk geometry are interpreted as a very complicated random variable g ≡ g(U ) which depends in a rather nonlinear way on the realisation U of the Brownian bridge.…”
Section: Jhep12(2016)055mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Determinantal point processes, which are used in [LW16] to compute the asymptotic distribution of a unitary Brownian bridge; • Large deviations, which are depicted in [Gui04] and used in [LM15] to compute the same limit as in [LW16].…”
Section: Wilson Loop Expectations For Simple Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%