2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.10.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the double ionization of helium by very slow antiproton impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results show a better overall agreement with the experimental data [1][2][3][4] than other ab initio calculations [6-9, 11-14, 16]. We have also presented the first doubly differential cross sections for single ionization at 10 and 100 keV antiproton energies which were obtained by considering the fully correlated two-electron dynamics of the He + p collisional system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The present results show a better overall agreement with the experimental data [1][2][3][4] than other ab initio calculations [6-9, 11-14, 16]. We have also presented the first doubly differential cross sections for single ionization at 10 and 100 keV antiproton energies which were obtained by considering the fully correlated two-electron dynamics of the He + p collisional system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…2), the present TDCC double ionization total cross sections are in excellent agreement with the experimental data over the entire range of antiproton energies considered. The experimental data consist of three sets of Andersen et al [1] (CERN90), of Hvelplund et al [2] (CERN94), and Knudsen et al [4] (CERN09). Also, the different TDCC calculations are in close agreement with each other.…”
Section: Total Ionization Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In agreement with the findings of Knudsen et al, they found that for larger Z/v the ratios increased as v −2 but were velocity independent as Z/v → 0. Antiproton and proton impact data were compared [10][11][12][13] with the observed differences in the double ionization being attributed to quantum interference, in accordance with the McGuire model. For a synopsis of the antiproton and proton studies see [11] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%