2013
DOI: 10.1111/peps.12060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Distribution of Job Performance: The Role of Measurement Characteristics in Observed Departures from Normality

Abstract: In a recent article, O'Boyle and Aguinis (2012) argued that job performance is not distributed normally but instead is nonnormal and highly skewed. However, we believe the extreme departures from normality observed by these authors may have been due to characteristics of performance measures used. To address this issue, we identify 7 measurement criteria that we argue must be present for inferences to be made about the distribution of job performance. Specifically, performance measures must: (a) reflect behavi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that job performance is typically defined as the actions or behaviors in which a worker engages, rather than the results or outcomes of those actions (Beck et al 2014;Campbell et al 1993;Motowidlo and Kell 2013). Furthermore, there are often multiple means to achieve a goal, meaning a number of different behaviors may be used to achieve the same results or outcomes (e.g., Huang and Zhang 2013;Kruglanski et al 2011).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is important to note that job performance is typically defined as the actions or behaviors in which a worker engages, rather than the results or outcomes of those actions (Beck et al 2014;Campbell et al 1993;Motowidlo and Kell 2013). Furthermore, there are often multiple means to achieve a goal, meaning a number of different behaviors may be used to achieve the same results or outcomes (e.g., Huang and Zhang 2013;Kruglanski et al 2011).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Beck et al () adopted the behavior‐based approach but noted that alternative types of performance indicators that do not conform to a behavior‐based definition “may indeed serve many useful organizational and research purposes” (p. 534). In fact, these two approaches to performance are clearly related.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors stress that the very theories of organizational behaviors serve as a basis for accounting for individual efficiency (Aguinis, O'Boyle, Gonzalez-Mulé, & Joo, 2015). They refer to measures of individual behaviors and their aggregation as well as indicators of results (Beck, Beatty, & Sackett, 2014). An example of integration of both these perspectives is a definition of productivity that is…”
Section: In Search Of Key Hr Practices For Improvement Of Productivitmentioning
confidence: 99%