2016
DOI: 10.1002/jcd.21529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Distances between Latin Squares and the Smallest Defining Set Size

Abstract: In this note we show that for each Latin square L of order n ≥ 2, there exists a Latin square L ′ = L of order n such that L and L ′ differ in at most 8 √ n cells. Equivalently, each Latin square of order n contains a Latin trade of size at most 8 √ n. We also show that the size of the smallest defining set in a Latin square is Ω(n 3/2 ).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cavenagh [Cav07] gave the first superlinear lower-bound of n⌊(log n) 1/3 /2⌋ in 2007. Recently, Cavenagh and Ramadurai [CR16] improved this bound to Ω(n 3/2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cavenagh [Cav07] gave the first superlinear lower-bound of n⌊(log n) 1/3 /2⌋ in 2007. Recently, Cavenagh and Ramadurai [CR16] improved this bound to Ω(n 3/2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%