2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10587-013-0052-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Diophantine equation x 2 − kxy + y 2 − 2 n = 0

Abstract: Abstract. In this study, we determine when the Diophantine equation x 2 −kxy+y 2 −2 n = 0 has an infinite number of positive integer solutions x and y for 0 n 10. Moreover, we give all positive integer solutions of the same equation for 0 n 10 in terms of generalized Fibonacci sequence. Lastly, we formulate a conjecture related to the Diophantine equation x 2 − kxy + y 2 − 2 n = 0.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) Suppose that n is even and that the equation x 2 − kxy + y 2 = −2 n has a positive integer solution, then clearly k is even because n ≥ 1, (the case n = 0 has been settled in [2]). Again the same method in the proof of Theorem 3.1 and Lemma 2.2 imply that k ≤ 2 n + 2 and k even.…”
Section: New Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(ii) Suppose that n is even and that the equation x 2 − kxy + y 2 = −2 n has a positive integer solution, then clearly k is even because n ≥ 1, (the case n = 0 has been settled in [2]). Again the same method in the proof of Theorem 3.1 and Lemma 2.2 imply that k ≤ 2 n + 2 and k even.…”
Section: New Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3.1. It was proved in [3], that the diophantine equation x 2 −kxy + y 2 = 2 n with k = 2 n − 2 has infinitly many solutions and in [2], that the Diophantine equation x 2 − kxy + y 2 = −2 n , with k = 2 n + 2 has infinitly many solutions. Hence the bounds of k in Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2 are sharp.…”
Section: New Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where a > 1 and b > 1 are different fixed integers. Firstly, Szalay [13] handled this equation for (a, b) = (2, 3), (2,5), and (2, 2 k ). He showed that there is no solution if (a, b) = (2, 3), only the solution n = 1 for (a, b) = (2, 5), and only the solution k = 2 and n = 3 for (a, b) = (2, 2 k ) with k > 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%