2004
DOI: 10.4153/cmb-2004-037-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Diophantine Equation n(n + d) · · · (n + (k − 1)d) = byl

Abstract: Abstract. We show that the product of four or five consecutive positive terms in arithmetic progression can never be a perfect power whenever the initial term is coprime to the common difference of the arithmetic progression. This is a generalization of the results of Euler and Obláth for the case of squares, and an extension of a theorem of Győry on three terms in arithmetic progressions. Several other results concerning the integral solutions of the equation of the title are also obtained. We extend results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, x + (k − 1)d, with gcd(x, d) = 1. The conjecture of Erdős has recently been verified for certain values of k in a more general form; see the papers [11,12,1,13]. Since now we focus on the case n = 5, we give only the best known result for this particular exponent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, x + (k − 1)d, with gcd(x, d) = 1. The conjecture of Erdős has recently been verified for certain values of k in a more general form; see the papers [11,12,1,13]. Since now we focus on the case n = 5, we give only the best known result for this particular exponent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One can cite for examples [4,[8][9][10][11][12][13]16,17,20,21]. In particular, Laishram and Shorey [16,17], Győry [11], Győry et al [12,13], and Bennett et al [4] give several finiteness results concerning the solutions of Eq. (2) under some assumptions.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[(5, 60)] (7,9) [(1, 3) , (5, 30)] (7,11) [ (3,12) , (−6, 12)] (8,12) [(2, 6)] (10,11) [(−6, 6)] (11,14) [(1, 2)] (11,15) [(−6, 4)] (12,14) [(−7, 12)] (13,15) [(−8, 24)]…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%