2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10714-017-2306-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the difference between Poincaré and Lorentz gravity

Abstract: The Poincaré invariance of GR is usually interpreted as Lorentz invariance plus diffeomorphism invariance. In this paper, by introducing the local inertial coordinates (LIC), it is shown that a theory with Lorentz and diffeomorphism invariance is not necessarily Poincaré invariant. Actually, the energy-momentum conservation is violated there. On the other hand, with the help of the LIC, the Poincaré invariance is reinterpreted as an internal symmetry. In this formalism, the conservation law is derived, which h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the diffeomorphism symmetry is a fundamental symmetry, which does not correspond to any conservation law directly. In fact, the energy-momentum conservation results from both the translation and diffeomorphism invariance, and likewise, the angular momentum conservation results from both the Lorentz and diffeomorphism invariance [8]. Secondly, the distributional dS constraint satisfies {H(Ω), H(Ω ′ )} = −H([Ω, Ω ′ ]), indicating that the localization of the dS group does not deform the dS algebra, including the translation algebra embedded in it.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, the diffeomorphism symmetry is a fundamental symmetry, which does not correspond to any conservation law directly. In fact, the energy-momentum conservation results from both the translation and diffeomorphism invariance, and likewise, the angular momentum conservation results from both the Lorentz and diffeomorphism invariance [8]. Secondly, the distributional dS constraint satisfies {H(Ω), H(Ω ′ )} = −H([Ω, Ω ′ ]), indicating that the localization of the dS group does not deform the dS algebra, including the translation algebra embedded in it.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the gauge transformations consist of the P/dS/AdS and diffeomorphism transformations, acting on the 5d connection and a 5d vector field ξ A . Actually, ξ A constitutes a system of local 5d Minkowski coordinates, named the local inertial coordinates (LIC) [5,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%