2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the development of a computer-based handwriting assessment tool to objectively quantify handwriting proficiency in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So, for students with ADHD in this study, the inferior performance in fine motor skills corroborates the literature, which reported that such performance can be attributed to the deficit in movement speed and to the immature coordination development, both subjected to the brain coordination of alternated muscle groups (29) , thus indicating that the results found in this study may lead the speech language pathologist to reflect more about the relations between visual-motor perception skills and the quality of dysgraphic writing among students with ADHD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…So, for students with ADHD in this study, the inferior performance in fine motor skills corroborates the literature, which reported that such performance can be attributed to the deficit in movement speed and to the immature coordination development, both subjected to the brain coordination of alternated muscle groups (29) , thus indicating that the results found in this study may lead the speech language pathologist to reflect more about the relations between visual-motor perception skills and the quality of dysgraphic writing among students with ADHD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Detailed analysis of the handwriting process is becoming increasingly available using computerised assessments, which measure temporal aspects such as speed, time spent with the pen on the page versus 'in air' time (Rosenblum, Parush, & Weiss, 2001), stroke durations (Falk, Tam, Schellnus, & Chau, 2011), and frequency of handwriting (van Drempt et al, 2011a). Computerised assessments have also been used to measure spatial and kinematic aspects of handwriting performance such as force regularity and consistency, movement trajectories (Phillips et al, 1994), position, angle and velocity of movement of the writing implement (Falk et al, 2011), and pressure exerted on the writing implement . Computerised assessments are also able to measure handwriting components such as grip strength and variations in the centre of mass, which are thought to correlate with legibility (Falk et al, 2011).…”
Section: Approaches To Handwriting Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grasps have also been categorized by the amount of hyperextension of the distal finger joints of the index finger (Selin, 2003;Ziviani, 1983) as a proxy for grip force. Recent research has indicated that grip force variability is a strong indicator of handwriting legibility (Falk, Tam, Schwellnus, & Chau, 2011) and that students with writing difficulties exhibit more static grip force patterns (Falk et al, 2010). Paired with the growing evidence that the different pencil grasps are functionally equivalent, these findings beg the question of whether the kinetic characteristics of different grasps are in fact similar.…”
Section: Grip and Axial Forcesmentioning
confidence: 64%