2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016wr019129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the deterministic and stochastic use of hydrologic models

Abstract: Environmental simulation models, such as precipitation‐runoff watershed models, are increasingly used in a deterministic manner for environmental and water resources design, planning, and management. In operational hydrology, simulated responses are now routinely used to plan, design, and manage a very wide class of water resource systems. However, all such models are calibrated to existing data sets and retain some residual error. This residual, typically unknown in practice, is often ignored, implicitly trus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(52 reference statements)
3
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the p value of the KS test for the DARD, introducing k as a random variable is able to significantly improve the performance of the process‐based analytical derivation approach in fitting annual runoff distribution. Therefore, the model error in runoff simulation should be a factor involved in deriving runoff distribution [ Farmer and Vogel , ]. Similar to the performance of the annual runoff model displayed in Figure a, the DARD for the Yangtze River generally has the better fitting effect on the annual runoff distribution than that for the Yellow River.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of the p value of the KS test for the DARD, introducing k as a random variable is able to significantly improve the performance of the process‐based analytical derivation approach in fitting annual runoff distribution. Therefore, the model error in runoff simulation should be a factor involved in deriving runoff distribution [ Farmer and Vogel , ]. Similar to the performance of the annual runoff model displayed in Figure a, the DARD for the Yangtze River generally has the better fitting effect on the annual runoff distribution than that for the Yellow River.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the trend/change‐point tests and time‐varying moments model are able to provide a primary argument for the nonstationarity of runoff series from statistical perspective, but they are unable to provide a physical insight into how the changes in the hydrological physical mechanisms behind runoff generation will lead to changes in the shape of the runoff frequency curves [ Merz et al ., ]. The nonstationarity of runoff series can originate from nonstationarity in hydrological inputs to hydrological systems, or nonstationarity in watershed characteristics dominating processes of runoff generation and routing, or both [ Blöschl and Sivapalan , ; Merz and Blöschl , , ; Hundecha and Merz , ; Rogger et al ., , , ; Merz et al ., ; Farmer and Vogel , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the region used by and . All data used herein have been archived by Farmer and Levin (2017).…”
Section: Massachusetts Sustainable Yield Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an inherent symptom of any modeling endeavor, all hydrologic models contain some degree of uncertainty (Montanari and Brath, 2004;Farmer and Vogel, 2016), whether a lumped or distributed conceptual runoff model (Renard et al, 2010) or a statistical model like the algorithms underlying the Massachusetts SYE. Movement away from methods grounded in traditional statistics toward conceptual, process-based models has dissociated our use of and blurred our understanding of model uncertainty to the point that most models are considered as almost purely deterministic tools (Wagener and Wheater, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation