2000
DOI: 10.1109/63.892701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the design of sliding mode control schemes for quantum resonant converters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Mahdavi et al [17] developed the first PWM based SM controlledĆuk converter in 1996. Concurrently, the work by Huang et al [13] also generated new interests on other types of higher order DC-DC converters, namely,Ćuk, Sepic, and quantum resonant converters [20]- [23].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Mahdavi et al [17] developed the first PWM based SM controlledĆuk converter in 1996. Concurrently, the work by Huang et al [13] also generated new interests on other types of higher order DC-DC converters, namely,Ćuk, Sepic, and quantum resonant converters [20]- [23].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum conversion Sliding-mode quantum conversion as a control method for resonant circuits has been treated extensively in for example [5], [6] and [7]. Quantum conversion in essence is a current pulse based switching method.…”
Section: Quantum Control Strategy For the Contactless Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good examples of the control method as applied in this paper (in different applications) can be found in [5], [6] and [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure the existence of SM operation, the local reachability condition 0 must be satisfied. This can be expressed as (20) Case 1-Buck Converter: For the DISM voltage controlled buck converter, the existence condition for steady-state operations (equilibrium point) [8], [18], [34], can be derived by substituting (8) eration of the system's dynamics (10) as (21), shown at the bottom of the page, where denotes the minimum input voltage; denotes the expected steady-state output, i.e., approximately the desired reference voltage ; and are, respectively, the maximum and minimum capacitor currents at full-load condition; and are respectively the maximum and minimum steady-state voltage errors, which in this case are basically the inverse functions of the output voltage ripples; and and are respectively the maximum and minimum integrals of the steady-state voltage error, which is the time integral of the inverse functions of the output voltage ripples with a negligible dc shift. All these parameters can be calculated from the design specification of the converter.…”
Section: Existence Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the use of adaptive strategies [12], [30], the incorporation of constant timing functions or circuitries [7], [9], [26], and the indirect implementation of the SM controllers [14], [29], [34]. As for the second concern, it has been widely known that the steady-state errors of SM controlled systems can be effectively suppressed through the use of an additional integral term of the state variables in the SM controller [9], [14], [19], [21], [23], [25]. This method is known as integral SM control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%