1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf02385980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the density theorems of Borel and Furstenberg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following extends a result of S. P. Wang [21], see also [20]; 6.3 below is also an analog of results in [13]. Here the representations are unitary and infinite dimensional, while those of [13] were nonunitary and finite dimensional.…”
Section: Let P Be a Strongly Continuous Unitary Representation Of Thesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The following extends a result of S. P. Wang [21], see also [20]; 6.3 below is also an analog of results in [13]. Here the representations are unitary and infinite dimensional, while those of [13] were nonunitary and finite dimensional.…”
Section: Let P Be a Strongly Continuous Unitary Representation Of Thesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…By 2.3, it is infixed. But by [13] (or in case (i), by [2]) these conditions imply that μ is G-fixed; therefore μ is a G-invariant measure.…”
Section: Admentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Borel density theorem [1] states that if G is a semisimple linear algebraic group/R and H is a discrete, or more generally a Euclidean closed subgroup such that G/H has finite volume (or more generally has property S) then the algebraic (Zariski) hull //* of H equals G. In [4] I proved certain generalizations of the Borel density theorem in various forms. Principally this was done for minimally almost periodic groups (Furstenberg's case [3]), complex analytic linear groups (done independently by a different method by S. P. Wang [5]) and real analytic linear groups G with radical R and with the property that G/R has no compact factors, R acts with real eigenvalues and H is a lattice in G. While there was a certain underlying unity to these results the methods seemed, on the surface, to be ad hoc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%