2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0001867800006388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Density Functions of Integrals of Gaussian Random Fields

Abstract: In the paper we consider the density functions of random variables that can be written as integrals of exponential functions of Gaussian random fields. In particular, we provide closed-form asymptotic bounds for the density functions and, under smoothness conditions, we derive exact tail approximations of the density functions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For heavy-tailed stochastic systems, some recent works are [5][6][7]. In the context of Gaussian processes and random fields, the most well studied events are the high level excursions (tail events of the supremum) [1]; the tail events of other convex functionals of Gaussian random fields are also of interest [15][16][17][18]. The method in this paper is in part built on the results in this literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For heavy-tailed stochastic systems, some recent works are [5][6][7]. In the context of Gaussian processes and random fields, the most well studied events are the high level excursions (tail events of the supremum) [1]; the tail events of other convex functionals of Gaussian random fields are also of interest [15][16][17][18]. The method in this paper is in part built on the results in this literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importance sampling based efficient simulation procedures have been proposed in the literature to estimate the tail probabilities. Numerical methods for rare-event analysis of the suprema were studied in [1,2]; see also [8,20,24,[26][27][28]34] for related studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%