Model Theory With Applications to Algebra and Analysis 2008
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511735226.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the definitions of difference Galois groups

Abstract: We compare several definitions of the Galois group of a linear difference equation that have arisen in algebra, analysis and model theory and show, that these groups are isomorphic over suitable fields. In addition, we study properties of Picard-Vessiot extensions over fields with not necessarily algebraically closed subfields of constants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(cf., [14], Proposition 2.7) If K is a total Σ∆Π-PV ring for equations (5) over k, then Lemma 6.7 and Corollary 6.15 imply the conclusion.…”
Section: σ∆π-Picard-vessiot Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(cf., [14], Proposition 2.7) If K is a total Σ∆Π-PV ring for equations (5) over k, then Lemma 6.7 and Corollary 6.15 imply the conclusion.…”
Section: σ∆π-Picard-vessiot Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…8] for systems of differential equations with parameters. However, our case is more subtle and, as a result, requires more work.Galois theory of difference equations φ(y) = Ay without the action of σ was studied in [46,10,1,2,3,4,58], with a non-linear generalization considered in [30,41], as well as with an action of a derivation ∂ in [31,32,34,18,20,19,21,17,16]. The latter works provide algebraic methods to test whether solutions of difference equations satisfy polynomial differential equations (see also [38] for a general Tannakian approach).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then there exists a finite cover of V ′′ of the form V ′ L , where V ′ is a finite cover of V. This is Lemma 4.2 of [9]. The same proof applies in the twisted-periodic case; compare 1.11(3) of Part II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%