“…For the most part, the approach taken here is known (de Saxcé et al, 2004;Fortin et al, 2003;Fortin et al, 2002;Li et al, 2009;Nicot et al, 2013;Moreau, 2010; Luding, 2010), however we consider three-dimensions and arbitrary particle shape and progress to the point where a new interpretation can be made. In particular, we present an argument that the component of stress relating to the angular velocity of particles, often referred to as ''centrifugal stress' ' (de Saxcé et al, 2004;Nicot et al, 2013), be excluded without exception from the definition of bulk stress. Without this term, we make further observations on the nature of stress symmetry in granular materials that will greatly simplify the process of accounting for dynamics in certain classes of materials, including the vast majority of Discrete Element Models where spherical particles are still commonplace.…”